This is a super-picky request that tells me that we are getting very close.
In this model: MGI_MGI_96175
If you search on the individuals associated with this annotation:
MGI:MGI:96175 RO:0002264 GO:0008284 MGI:MGI:3613407|PMID:15714286 ECO:0000315 MGI:MGI:1857992 2006-03-07 MGI GOREL:0001004(EMAPA:16402),GOREL:0001008(CL:0000134) creation-date=2006-03-07|modification-date=2006-03-07|contributor-id=http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7476-6306
You will see that the object of the regulation, [GO:0008283] cell population proliferation, is split into two individuals/instances. Although this is acceptable, it would be more precise if when two regulates_o_x chain relations are comma separated only one individual is made. In this case, there would be one cellular population proliferation and both the third branchial arch and the mesenchymal stem cell relationships would be attached to it.
This is a super-picky request that tells me that we are getting very close.
In this model: MGI_MGI_96175
If you search on the individuals associated with this annotation:
MGI:MGI:96175 RO:0002264 GO:0008284 MGI:MGI:3613407|PMID:15714286 ECO:0000315 MGI:MGI:1857992 2006-03-07 MGI GOREL:0001004(EMAPA:16402),GOREL:0001008(CL:0000134) creation-date=2006-03-07|modification-date=2006-03-07|contributor-id=http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7476-6306
You will see that the object of the regulation, [GO:0008283] cell population proliferation, is split into two individuals/instances. Although this is acceptable, it would be more precise if when two regulates_o_x chain relations are comma separated only one individual is made. In this case, there would be one cellular population proliferation and both the third branchial arch and the mesenchymal stem cell relationships would be attached to it.