Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support of TMS #910

Open
IGNF-Xavier opened this issue Jun 21, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Support of TMS #910

IGNF-Xavier opened this issue Jun 21, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
feature request A suggestion or request (not a proposal)
Milestone

Comments

@IGNF-Xavier
Copy link

Description

I would like to request adding support oF TMS for basemap in the mapviewer of the datas

Motivation

During Geocom, it was said that OSM will use TMS instead of WMTS
Moreover it will allow the owner of the datahub to propose the appropriate style of this TMS.

@IGNF-Xavier IGNF-Xavier added the feature request A suggestion or request (not a proposal) label Jun 21, 2024
@jahow jahow added this to the 2.4.0 milestone Jul 1, 2024
@jahow jahow moved this to Waiting for resources in geonetwork-ui roadmap Jul 1, 2024
@jahow
Copy link
Collaborator

jahow commented Jan 28, 2025

So this PR adds support for vector tile layers as basemap: #1073

But I realize now (after talking to @mmohadIGN) that some of us misunderstood the need here because this does not allow adding a TMS layer using image tiles. I mean, you can specify a tiled image using the xyz type, but you can't give it an object like so:

{
  type: 'tms',
  url: 'https://data.gpf.fr/tms/1.0.0/',
  name: 'PLAN.IGN'
}

@IGNF-Xavier could you please clarify whether the current state is enough for you?

@IGNF-Xavier
Copy link
Author

Hello,
ROK4 - the software used for delivering WMTS and TMS - has a bug which has for consequences to display in the Getcapabilities of TMS (https://data.geopf.fr/tms/1.0.0/) the endpoints of WMTS and TMS.

It will be solved in a few weeks (the correction is in qualification environment) and you will have only TMS layers like PLAN.IGN : https://data.geopf.fr/tms/1.0.0/PLAN.IGN/ in which you can fin Mbstyles Json.

There is two ways to develop the support of TMS ( #910) :

  • n°1 : Use of the Mbstyles in the metadata
  • n°2 : Use of the Mbstyles in the getcapabilities

I think n°2 is the best way for the support of the TMS. Probably also for basemap if the end-user is allowed to change the style of basemap.

@jahow
Copy link
Collaborator

jahow commented Jan 29, 2025

Moving this to 2.4.1 because we need to implement TMS protocol in ogc-client

@jahow jahow modified the milestones: 2.4.0, 2.4.1 Jan 29, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature request A suggestion or request (not a proposal)
Projects
Status: Waiting for resources
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants