rfc(decision): DRAFT: Environment Variable conventions

Author: cleptric

Diff for: README.md

@@ -58,4 +58,4 @@ This repository contains RFCs and DACIs. Lost?
 - [0101-revamping-the-sdk-performance-api](text/0101-revamping-the-sdk-performance-api.md): Revamping the SDK Performance API
 - [0106-artifact-indices](text/0106-artifact-indices.md): Improvements to Source Maps Processing
 - [0116-sentry-semantic-conventions](text/0116-sentry-semantic-conventions.md): Sentry Semantic Conventions
-- [0117-mobile-transactions-and-spans](text/0117-mobile-transactions-and-spans.md): Transactions and Spans for Mobile Platforms
+- [0117-mobile-transactions-and-spans](text/0117-mobile-transactions-and-spans.md): Transactions and Spans for Mobile Platforms- [0121-draft-environment-variable-conventions](text/0121-draft-environment-variable-conventions.md): DRAFT: Environment Variable conventions

Diff for: text/0121-draft-environment-variable-conventions.md

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+- Start Date: 2023-11-07
+- RFC Type: decision
+- RFC PR: https://github.com/getsentry/rfcs/pull/121
+- RFC Status: draft
+
+# Summary
+
+One paragraph explanation of the feature or document purpose.
+
+# Motivation
+
+Why are we doing this? What use cases does it support? What is the expected outcome?
+
+# Background
+
+The reason this decision or document is required. This section might not always exist.
+
+# Supporting Data
+
+[Metrics to help support your decision (if applicable).]
+
+# Options Considered
+
+If an RFC does not know yet what the options are, it can propose multiple options. The
+preferred model is to propose one option and to provide alternatives.
+
+# Drawbacks
+
+Why should we not do this? What are the drawbacks of this RFC or a particular option if
+multiple options are presented.
+
+# Unresolved questions
+
+- What parts of the design do you expect to resolve through this RFC?
+- What issues are out of scope for this RFC but are known?