+Audit result: ✅ all listed `CTR-001` through `CTR-026` rows currently include non-empty implementation references and non-empty test coverage targets; no `TODO` placeholders were found in the mapping table. Review window: daily optimizer cycle 2026-09-06, covering commits merged in the prior 48 hours (repository history begins at `8fb0a67`, the sole reachable commit; no additional compiler or parser diffs were available to review beyond the existing baseline). Security-relevant items evaluated: (1) **Spec-to-implementation sync gap**: the specification header and Section 2 sync table were previously bumped to version `1.0.30` (documenting the CTR-001 status-function guard for compiler-owned prerequisites, `guardIfAgainstStatusFuncBypass`/`ifExpressionContainsStatusFunc` in `pkg/workflow/compiler_builtin_job_augmentation.go`), but this Section 7.2 mapping audit and the Section 10 change log were not updated to match, violating the Section 7.3 sync protocol. Verified the guard is implemented and covered by `TestApplyBuiltinJobNeedsAugmentations_StatusFuncAddsSuccessGuards`, `TestApplyBuiltinJobNeedsAugmentations_StatusFuncFailureAddsSuccessGuards`, `TestApplyBuiltinJobNeedsAugmentations_StatusFuncAlwaysAddsSuccessGuards`, and `TestApplyBuiltinJobNeedsAugmentations_StatusFuncKeepsCustomJobUnguarded` (`pkg/workflow/compiler_custom_jobs_test.go`); this is a documentation-sync fix only, not a new threat class, so no new `CTR-*` rule is required. (2) Reviewed open code-scanning alerts (severity critical/high) via GitHub MCP: alerts #674/#669/#668/#667 (`go/bad-redirect-check`), #672 (`go/allocation-size-overflow`), and #663 (`js/http-to-file-access`) affect non-compiler tooling (`pkg/cli/add_package_manifest_imports.go`, `pkg/cli/add_package_manifest_includes.go`, `pkg/cli/project_command.go`, `scripts/ensure-docs-slide-pdf.js`) and are outside this specification's conformance targets (Section 3.1: `pkg/workflow/`, `pkg/parser/`, `actions/setup/`); alerts #653 (`workflow-out-of-context`) and #651/#652 (`workflow-go-graphql-injection-sprintf`) are findings from the `daily-malicious-code-scan` and `daily-semgrep-scan` workflows' own self-scans and are tracked by those workflows' remediation processes, not compiler-generated-workflow threat detection. No new compiler-side threat class identified. (3) No `threat-detection-suppress` annotations were found in any live (non-fixture, non-documentation-example) workflow source in this review window, so no `SLA_BREACH` or expiration findings apply. No new `CTR-*` rule required this cycle.
0 commit comments