-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 59
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
northern #137
Comments
This also seems to affect southern, eastern (but not western). To provide a cross linguistic motivation, Irish distinguishes between 'lying north', 'from the north'.
So perhaps, there is a justification for this split, but the definitions could be updated? |
it makes sense for me. |
What changes will be made? What was the decision? Maybe closing with a reference to a commit would better document the changes? |
Hi, I closed because the last comment seemed to agree that no changes are necessary, right? |
I believe that the glosses should be updated to remove the confusing intersections caused by the OR. We have:
1 and 2 start with |
Okay, good point. I would suggest removing the 'situated in' from the definition 'situated in or oriented toward the north' as this seems more disjoint to me. |
IMHO, considering your argument about cross-linguistic motivation, it would make things clear if we make the glosses really disjoint avoiding the OR: 1) |
I am not keen to make such a fine sense distinction and introduce a new synset as (IMHO) this is not a sense distinction that is made in general in English, e.g., "Brazilian" means both situated in and coming from Brazil. The sense of orientated is synonymous with "northerly" and there is not normally an equivalent for most origins, i.e., there is no "Brazilianly" meaning orientated towards Brazil. Perhaps we can push this until we have a better idea of when to make sense distinctions (see #243)? |
Ok, but I am not suggesting the creation of new synsets, just the rewritten of the definitions. |
Is the idea to essentially remove "or" from these definitions, and to have each of refer to orientation, origin, and situation individually? Perhaps the new definitions would look something like: 01601297-a northerly, northern (oriented toward the north; "going in a northerly direction") 01601069-a northerly, northern (coming from the north; used especially of wind; "the north wind doth blow"; "a northern snowstorm"; "the winds are northerly") 01604226-a northern (situated in the regions of the north; "the northern hemisphere"; "northern autumn colors"; "the northern suburbs") To me this makes sense. the original definition for 01601297-a describes a sense of "northerly" which is also essentially covered by 01604226-a. |
Closed by #573 |
I can't see the difference, especially because the
or
which makessituated in
valid for both cases.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: