Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

impl: use gcp-sdk-lro as a named feature #689

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 14, 2025

Conversation

coryan
Copy link
Contributor

@coryan coryan commented Jan 13, 2025

Now that the gcp-sdk-lro crate exists, configure sidekick to
automatically add this as a dependency of any generated crate with LROs.

Fixes #688

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 13, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.73%. Comparing base (12d2013) to head (7786387).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #689   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.73%   95.73%           
=======================================
  Files          33       33           
  Lines        1244     1244           
=======================================
  Hits         1191     1191           
  Misses         53       53           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@coryan coryan marked this pull request as ready for review January 13, 2025 23:32
@coryan coryan requested a review from codyoss January 13, 2025 23:32
@coryan coryan enabled auto-merge (squash) January 13, 2025 23:33
Now that the `gcp-sdk-lro` crate exists, configure `sidekick` to
automatically add this as a dependency of any generated crate with LROs.
@coryan coryan force-pushed the feat-lro-helpers-pr3 branch from f328d07 to 7786387 Compare January 14, 2025 14:16
@coryan coryan merged commit bb5fa13 into googleapis:main Jan 14, 2025
14 checks passed
@coryan coryan deleted the feat-lro-helpers-pr3 branch January 14, 2025 15:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

generator links the new library when needed
2 participants