You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm not sure if it easy to do or even possible with the current architecture of the tool, but we got some incidents due to next behaviour:
k8s sts was scaled down
due to that underlaying disks were unmounted, while PV referring them are still in place
engineer from the team runs unused tool and remove disks that are currently unmounted
after scale-up event pods can't start as there is no disks referred by existing PV
It could be less an issue after k8s 1.27 and persistentvolumeclaim-retention, but should we add some extra checks (in the tool or maybe external) to check if there any PV referring to the disk before deleting them?