feat!: Upgrade to Binaryen v120 #206
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
spotandjake
approved these changes
Oct 31, 2025
Member
spotandjake
left a comment
spotandjake
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good to me.
Note:
We are not planning to, but if we are merging this into main, we should probably use the local esy package.
Opam ci still needs to pass after the releases are merged as well.
ospencer
force-pushed
the
oscar/119
branch
2 times, most recently
from
b078d29 to
7c3b43f
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Full diff here: WebAssembly/binaryen@version_119...version_120_b
No FFI changes.