-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Official Graphite docker images #1874
Comments
Nope, I've never created anything on dockerhub.
…On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Denis Zhdanov ***@***.***> wrote:
Hello!
I'm personally not a great fan of Docker, especially on PROD, but I can
admit that's a great packer tool, especially for packages with multiple
dependencies.
So, I think we need to create official docker images for 1.0.0 too.
Current issues:
1. I can't add 'graphite' or 'graphiteproject' organization on
dockerhub for some reason. Now I created graphiteapp. @obfuscurity
<https://github.com/obfuscurity> - did you created one? I can't find
it using search, though.
2. Current most popular graphite images which we have on dockerhub:
https://github.com/hopsoft/docker-graphite-statsd
https://github.com/nickstenning/docker-graphite
Should we fork them or create separate one?
3. Should we include statsd? or Grafana?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1874>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAeLAr_2JwJtTyXH23cfNBlb12-3g_X7ks5rpqY3gaJpZM4Mpg7k>
.
|
I would include Grafana and statsd or collectd. |
I would NOT include grafana or statsd/collectd. It would blow up the container image. There is an official grafana image. |
I'd propose a small fleet of images that are designed to work together, with carbon and graphite-web as the core, and potentially modified versions of the grafana and/or statsd/collectd images to help people get going quickly. Once they're published then it would be relatively easy to give people a docker-compose.xml that could fire up a complete stack based on the individual images. |
People have been asking me for a BigGraphite image, I'll be happy to base it on top of a Graphite image. |
All of the inofficial docker images are out of date (0.9.x), but I can report that I'm using the hopsoft image succesfully. Basically, I want exactly that but with the current stable ;-) |
OK, I just pushed this - https://github.com/graphite-project/docker-graphite-statsd and this - https://hub.docker.com/r/graphiteapp/graphite-statsd/. I asked @hopsoft's permission to reuse his code. |
I want to include small snippet to http://graphiteapp.org/quick-start-guides/
|
PR for website - graphite-project/graphite-project.github.io#35 |
Is this issue closed? |
Yes, we have docker image and it has open repo now - https://github.com/graphite-project/docker-graphite-statsd |
Hello!
I'm personally not a great fan of Docker, especially on PROD, but I should admit that's a great packer tool, especially for packages with multiple dependencies.
So, I think we need to create official docker images for 1.0.0 too.
Current issues:
https://github.com/hopsoft/docker-graphite-statsd
https://github.com/nickstenning/docker-graphite
https://github.com/sitespeedio/docker-graphite-statsd
Should we fork them or create separate one?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: