Missing Failed Row Identification in Results for expect_column_values_to_be_type and expect_column_values_to_be_in_type_list Expectations

[akmahi]

Describe the bug
The expect_column_values_to_be_type and expect_column_values_to_be_in_type_list expectations do not provide failed row identification in their results.

Expected behavior
The documentation([https://greatexpectations.io/expectations/expect_column_values_to_be_of_type]) includes the result format as

{ "exception_info": { "raised_exception": false, "exception_traceback": null, "exception_message": null }, "result": { "element_count": 3, "unexpected_count": 3, "unexpected_percent": 100.0, "partial_unexpected_list": [ "12345", "abcde", "1b3d5" ], "missing_count": 0, "missing_percent": 0.0, "unexpected_percent_total": 100.0, "unexpected_percent_nonmissing": 100.0 }, "meta": {}, "success": false }

But , actual output is

{ "success": false, "expectation_config": { "type": "expect_column_values_to_be_of_type", "kwargs": { "batch_id": "spark_data_source-my_data_asset", "column": "Location", "type_": "IntegerType" }, "meta": {} }, "result": { "observed_value": "StringType" }, "meta": {}, "exception_info": { "raised_exception": false, "exception_traceback": null, "exception_message": null } }
Environment (please complete the following information):

• Operating System: { Linux]
• Great Expectations Version: [1.2.0]
• Data Source: [spark]

[adeola-ak]

Hi there, thanks for reporting this. I can confirm that I’m also able to reproduce the issue and have reached out to the team to clarify the expected behavior for these expectations. Please stay tuned for updates