Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Research best practices in ISO layout #84

Open
mika opened this issue Mar 19, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Research best practices in ISO layout #84

mika opened this issue Mar 19, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@mika
Copy link
Member

mika commented Mar 19, 2020

We should research whether the way our ISOs are generated with xorriso, isohybrid etc are still all follow best practices of year 2020.

Thomas Schmitt wrote a great summary in https://lists.debian.org/debian-cd/2019/07/msg00007.html (restumbled upon it via a recent discussion in https://lists.debian.org/debian-live/2020/03/msg00213.html) and there's a reference also at https://wiki.debian.org/RepackBootableISO

What I'm also interested in is a nice way to make our ISOs more customization-friendly, especially when having the need to add further partition(s) to a USB stick when dd-ing the Grml ISO onto it (without having to use grml2usb and having to manually deal with the appropriate partition layout).

FTR: we're interested in amd64 and i386 architectures only, though would like to have the system boot on as many systems as possible out of the box (BIOS, EFI + SecureBoot).

@mika
Copy link
Member Author

mika commented May 4, 2020

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant