We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I have tried several times and found that the action of flushAll method is difference from the flush_all telnet Memcached command:
//Add() some values System.out.println("Add foo: " + mcClient.add("foo", "This is foo value"));
//Get() values System.out.println("Get foo: " + mcClient.get("foo"));
System.out.println("Flush all key in cached: " + mcClient.flushAll());
the flushAll() method wipe out the cached while the flush_all command only set all items of the cache to invalidate state.
Is it a bug? or I just used it wrong way?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
I have tried several times and found that the action of flushAll method is difference from the flush_all telnet Memcached command:
//Add() some values
System.out.println("Add foo: " + mcClient.add("foo", "This is foo value"));
//Get() values
System.out.println("Get foo: " + mcClient.get("foo"));
System.out.println("Flush all key in cached: " + mcClient.flushAll());
the flushAll() method wipe out the cached while the flush_all command only set all items of the cache to invalidate state.
Is it a bug? or I just used it wrong way?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: