Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider flake-parts compat #148

Open
yangm97 opened this issue Jun 27, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Consider flake-parts compat #148

yangm97 opened this issue Jun 27, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@yangm97
Copy link

yangm97 commented Jun 27, 2024

I really like FUP but right now it stands as a big monolith which requires a full buy-in.
Splitting functionality into a set of flake-parts modules might be desired.

Context: I'm rewriting my config to use flake-parts because it became a tangled mess (my fault) but I'd like to keep using FUP to some extent i.e. the repl command.

https://flake.parts/

@gytis-ivaskevicius
Copy link
Owner

Tell me something, what else do you like about fup?

For a while, I was thinking of deprecating fup in favor of flake-parts since it is a great project, but it involves more stuff than just moving things out from my side

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants