You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Page 24: 6 lines from the bottom you use first "default-initialized", and next sentence "initalized by default". Are those the same? Then I'd suggest using twice the same phrase. This is confusing.
Also what's the relation of the first sentence to the second? Right now I'm reading it as "If no constructor is defined, members are initialzied by default EXCEPT if they are of built-in type, then not." Correct?
Then page 26 line 3: "prior to the function .... " So: if there is no constructor, built-in type members are not initialized by default, but if there is a default constructor they are? Truly weird. Might be worth remarking on.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Possibly related to #21
Page 24: 6 lines from the bottom you use first "default-initialized", and next sentence "initalized by default". Are those the same? Then I'd suggest using twice the same phrase. This is confusing.
Also what's the relation of the first sentence to the second? Right now I'm reading it as "If no constructor is defined, members are initialzied by default EXCEPT if they are of built-in type, then not." Correct?
Then page 26 line 3: "prior to the function .... " So: if there is no constructor, built-in type members are not initialized by default, but if there is a default constructor they are? Truly weird. Might be worth remarking on.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: