-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 75
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support for s3 object storage #1005
Comments
Hey @KiaraGrouwstra, right now we do not plan to add support for the Object Storage S3 API in this terraform provider. You can use any S3-compatible provider like the Minio provider instead. If using other providers does not work for you, could you explain the issues you have with them and the benefits you see with adding the APIs to this provider? |
i'll try that one - thank you for your response! |
i would have prefered to have all from one hand. it would also feel strange if i could create server, firewalls, ... via hetzner cli but not the object storage. i would vote for reopening the issue |
As I understood, creating buckets and access keys must be done using Hetzner API. We already successfully configured existing buckets (object lifecycle ruels) using other existing providers, but it would be nice to be able to create the buckets using this provider (saves a manual step in the UI) |
Hello all 👋 All our integrations rely on the Hetzner Cloud public API, which is available with a certain level of stability. Since the features you are requesting are not in the public API, we cannot implement them. Therefore, for the time being, we do not plan to support:
Note that only a subset of the Amazon S3 features are currently supported. We will leave this ticket open to increase its visibility. If you have questions, reach out to us using the Support Center. |
please correct me if i am wong, as i assume that hcloud cli code is the core for the terrform provider, excuse the crosspost: let us vote for hetznercloud/cli#918 maybe this awesome hetzner developers ❤️ get a bigger budget if we vote for the issue, which i see as voting for them (the hetzner developers). cheers |
What whould you like to see?
hetzner recently introduced their S3-compatible object storage, offering immutable storage cheaper than their regular shared volumes.
it would be cool if this provider would facilitate configuring hetzner object storage as well, tho it seems given it's in beta there is currently still a manual step to request access involved as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: