Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ACMEv2 progress? #314

Closed
athanp opened this issue Dec 17, 2018 · 5 comments
Closed

ACMEv2 progress? #314

athanp opened this issue Dec 17, 2018 · 5 comments

Comments

@athanp
Copy link

athanp commented Dec 17, 2018

Any progress finalizing acme v2 implementation?

@athanp
Copy link
Author

athanp commented Dec 27, 2018

No answer after 10 days...
I assume we now have another "great but dead opensource project"😄

@tallship
Copy link

tallship commented Dec 27, 2018

Yes. Absolutely. "...dead opensource project".

I've been a Slackware user for 25 years. You echo a hollow, rhetorical question often predicated upon a myriad of frustrations. Here's the deal. It works, is relevant, and to move forward all one needs ever do if their impatient or disatisfied, is click the little 'fork' button up there on the top of the project page.

If you visit the Slackware site it often appears to be quite dated. And yet, it remains relevant and although is indeed actively maintained on a daily basis if one bothers to check the Changelog, this on the surface idleness spawns a continual barage of, "...is this distro dead?", sort of inquiry.

This projects software works great anyway! And lofty aspersions toward loftier goals often results in the realization of just how monumental or formidable something on the roadmap is going to be - especially for an Open Source Project, that might depend upon the eeked out spare time of developers involved.

Have you searched for an alternative LE related client project that fits the needs that you believe an acme v2 would provide? That's another one of those, rhetorical, questions.

I run a lot of really old software on my brand shiny new OSes, and I can tell you that even though some of these old favs are three and seven and more years old, I prefer using those to the newer ones, especially when considering that there is often replacement software in terms of alternative FOSS projects.

I customize what I need, watch for security issues, and continue to use something with less complexity than I actually need. wrt the LE experiment become de facto standard, I also run something called "le". You won't find it in the repos, it's been renamed, and I don't run that more modern, and much more sophisticated, Bash LE client.

When installing on a new machine, I install one of a couple of much older (and lightly customized) versions from my fork of the project a couple of years back.

I encourage you to consider the ramifications of passive-aggressive implications that a project is dead, or irrelevant, as such is usually much further from the truth than is good for all of us here in the community - especially yourself.

@simonszu
Copy link

To play devil's advocate: acmetool will be irrelevant in around 9 months since letsencrypt will shutdown acme v1, and acmetool has no implementation of v2.

https://community.letsencrypt.org/t/end-of-life-plan-for-acmev1/88430

@athanp
Copy link
Author

athanp commented Mar 30, 2019

Hate to admit that but I've migrated to Lego which supports acme-v2 since last year

@hlandau
Copy link
Owner

hlandau commented Oct 16, 2019

A beta of ACMEv2 support is now available, see #322.

@hlandau hlandau closed this as completed Oct 16, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants