You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm working on a project where we plan to replace our custom algorithm in some scenarios with a rule engine, and among a few options, I suggested using this one. In the first Proof of Concept (PoC), I needed to make a modification to achieve the same result as in Java aplication, and that involved using the RE2 regex, where I had to switch the default library to one that can handle lookaheads and lookbehinds.
However, I wouldn't like to continue the project with an in-house fork within the company.
Would it be possible to consider adding a default function that utilizes the RE2 regex?
This way, we could maintain the current regex and have a separate new function that supports RE2.
The library I used and worked well is: "github.com/dlclark/regexp2". If you know of another one with more frequent updates, that would be good to explore.
Example expression not supported by the Go standard library: ^00(?!56)[1-9][0-9]{7,}
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm working on a project where we plan to replace our custom algorithm in some scenarios with a rule engine, and among a few options, I suggested using this one.
In the first Proof of Concept (PoC), I needed to make a modification to achieve the same result as in Java aplication, and that involved using the RE2 regex, where I had to switch the default library to one that can handle lookaheads and lookbehinds.
However, I wouldn't like to continue the project with an in-house fork within the company.
Would it be possible to consider adding a default function that utilizes the RE2 regex?
This way, we could maintain the current regex and have a separate new function that supports RE2.
The library I used and worked well is: "github.com/dlclark/regexp2". If you know of another one with more frequent updates, that would be good to explore.
Example expression not supported by the Go standard library: ^00(?!56)[1-9][0-9]{7,}
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: