Replace usage of FromStr::from_str with str::parse across the project

[Stukalov-A-M]

It's best to use the inherent str::parse<T: FromStr> method across the project instead of FromStr::from_str since it doesn't require bringing FromStr into the scope.

[Stukalov-A-M]

Implemented From<&str>, replace parse to &str

[nxsaken]

@Stukalov-A-M str::parse<T> is more convenient than Into<T>::into in cases where type inference fails, thanks to the turbofish syntax. It is also more idiomatic in this case: FromStr carries the intent of extracting meaning from a string, while (Try)From is more suited for type conversions, where the string probably stays the same but the context around it is changed.

[Stukalov-A-M]

@Stukalov-A-M str::parse<T> is more convenient than Into<T>::into in cases where type inference fails, thanks to the turbofish syntax. It is also more idiomatic in this case: FromStr carries the intent of extracting meaning from a string, while (Try)From is more suited for type conversions, where the string probably stays the same but the context around it is changed.

Could u pls. send the ref where it's said about idiomaticity ?

I found only info that parse::() we're using were cast may bring to an error and Into:: where we sure that str will be casted into the the without errors

[nxsaken]

Here are some discussions on it:

• https://users.rust-lang.org/t/is-there-actually-a-semantic-difference-between-fromstr-and-tryfrom-str/92765/2
• https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/pre-rfc-deprecate-fromstr-in-favor-of-tryfrom-str/12331/5

If the parsing is infallible, it's possible to specify the empty Infallible type as the Err associated type in FromStr.

[Stukalov-A-M]

Here are some discussions on it:

• https://users.rust-lang.org/t/is-there-actually-a-semantic-difference-between-fromstr-and-tryfrom-str/92765/2
• https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/pre-rfc-deprecate-fromstr-in-favor-of-tryfrom-str/12331/5

If the parsing is infallible, it's possible to specify the empty Infallible type as the Err associated type in FromStr.

Thanks a lot! I'll research the discussions.