Do you plan to support Flatpak or AppImage?

[652436962]

Do you plan to support Flatpak or AppImage?

[sensei-hacker]

I don't see any benefit to Flatpak or AppImage over the four existing formats available for Linux. Any reason you can't use the zip? Or the rpm or deb package?

[Phrozenn1]

The benefit of flatpak is that it's the closest thing to a universal format for linux as you get. It supports all distros and it would be a godsend for the users that might struggle installing stuff manually.

[sensei-hacker]

The benefit of flatpak is that it's the closest thing to a universal format for linux as you get. It supports all distros and it would be a godsend for the users that might struggle installing stuff manually.

Which distro are you having trouble on?

[Phrozenn1]

The benefit of flatpak is that it's the closest thing to a universal format for linux as you get. It supports all distros and it would be a godsend for the users that might struggle installing stuff manually.

Which distro are you having trouble on?

I'm not having trouble. Just backing a very good suggestion to release a flatpak version

[krabodyan]

I am also interested in Nix support. Since nixpkgs only has version 5.1. Perhaps inav could have its own Nix Flake