Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Weird appearence of the term requierments at the end of the document #21

Closed
henkbirkholz opened this issue Feb 10, 2021 · 2 comments · Fixed by #27
Closed

Weird appearence of the term requierments at the end of the document #21

henkbirkholz opened this issue Feb 10, 2021 · 2 comments · Fixed by #27

Comments

@henkbirkholz
Copy link
Member

Based on https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/okJriJPpapmZgeOfjbVGVP57bQk/

Depending on the use cases covered, there can be additional
requirements. An exemplary subset is illustrated in this section.

Here starts to talk about “additional requirements”, but I wonder there is no other places in this draft talking about requirement, so what are the basic requirements?
@eckelmeckel
Copy link
Collaborator

Perhaps we should introduce a dedicated section "(Basic) Requirements", describing basic requirements, such as:

  • "Integrity": The information provided by the Attester MUST be integral. This may be achieved by means of a digital signature over the attestation evidence.
  • "(Attester) Authentication": The information provided by the Attester MUST be authentic. The Attester should authenticate itself to the Verifier. This may be an implicit authentication by means of a digital signature over the Attestation Evidence, which does not require additional protocol steps.

@eckelmeckel
Copy link
Collaborator

I suggest to place the new section"(Basic) Requirements" directly after "Scope and Intent".

eckelmeckel added a commit to eckelmeckel/draft-ietf-rats-reference-interaction-models that referenced this issue Apr 23, 2021
@eckelmeckel
Fixes weird appearence of the term requirements.
284f683 
Fixes ietf-rats-wg#21.
Weird appearence of the term requierments at the end of the document.
eckelmeckel added a commit to eckelmeckel/draft-ietf-rats-reference-interaction-models that referenced this issue Apr 23, 2021
@eckelmeckel
Fixes weird appearence of the term requirements.
9fad48f 
Fixes ietf-rats-wg#21 (Weird appearence of the term requierments at the end of the
document).

Signed-off-by: Michael Eckel <[email protected]>
@eckelmeckel eckelmeckel mentioned this issue Apr 23, 2021
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
2 participants
@henkbirkholz @eckelmeckel