Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Reference Claims vs Reference Values #17

Closed
henkbirkholz opened this issue Feb 10, 2021 · 2 comments · Fixed by #34
Closed

Reference Claims vs Reference Values #17

henkbirkholz opened this issue Feb 10, 2021 · 2 comments · Fixed by #34

Comments

@henkbirkholz
Copy link
Member

Based on https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/okJriJPpapmZgeOfjbVGVP57bQk/

Reference Claims ('refClaims') mandatory
Reference Claims are components of Reference Values as defined in
[I-D.ietf-rats-architecture]. [Editor's Note: Definition might
become obsolete, if replaced by Reference Values. Is there a
difference between Claims and Values here? Analogously, why is
not named Reference Claims in the RATS arch?]

I suggest using Reference Values to keep consistent with the RATS arch.
@eckelmeckel
Copy link
Collaborator

+1 for "Reference Values"

@henkbirkholz
Copy link
Member Author

on it

@henkbirkholz henkbirkholz mentioned this issue Apr 25, 2021
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
2 participants
@henkbirkholz @eckelmeckel