Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Scope of Claims Set in Claims Selection #19

Closed
henkbirkholz opened this issue Feb 10, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #38
Closed

Scope of Claims Set in Claims Selection #19

henkbirkholz opened this issue Feb 10, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #38

Comments

@henkbirkholz
Copy link
Member

Based on https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/okJriJPpapmZgeOfjbVGVP57bQk/

Claim Selection ('claimSelection'): optional
A statement that represents a (sub-)set of Claims that can be
created by an Attester.
Claim Selections can act as filters that can specify the exact set
of Claims to be included in Evidence. An Attester MAY decide
whether or not to provide all Claims as requested via a Claim
Selection.

The “all Claims” may be ambiguous, I’d like to double check, does it refer to all Claims that the Attester can create or refer to all Claims requested in the Claim Selection?
@eckelmeckel
Copy link
Collaborator

If understand correctly, the message here is that an Attester can decide to provide less Claims than specified in the Claims Selection, which appears viable to me and is used in practice, too. I will adapt the text accordingly.

@eckelmeckel eckelmeckel mentioned this issue Apr 25, 2021
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Scope of Claims Set in Claims Selection. eckelmeckel/draft-ietf-rats-reference-interaction-models
2 participants
@henkbirkholz @eckelmeckel