- Should we review the current project name to avoid confusion with [original (abandoned?) repository](https://github.com/Quramy/graphql-decorator) - As the original license is MIT and we are drastically changing the original source to the point that it is not mergeable anymore (see #21 and #22), I believe we could reference the [original repository](https://github.com/Quramy/graphql-decorator) on the readme but update other references to Taqtile? - [LICENSE.txt](https://github.com/indigotech/graphql-schema-decorator/blob/5c31ece894a7d31fe131dc5d4113159820dc56ba/LICENSE.txt#L3) - [`package.json`'s author](https://github.com/indigotech/graphql-schema-decorator/blob/5c31ece894a7d31fe131dc5d4113159820dc56ba/package.json#L21) - [all examples - `package.json`](https://github.com/indigotech/graphql-schema-decorator/blob/5c31ece894a7d31fe131dc5d4113159820dc56ba/examples/simple-crud/package.json#L19) - Should we stop being a fork? There are some downsides like not being able to search code <img width="625" alt="screenshot 2017-10-25 15 10 41" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/700480/32012488-c5f6d8b8-b996-11e7-9289-a8ad22906e96.png">
package.json's authorpackage.json