Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Does this support LTI 1.1 ? #104

Closed
banister opened this issue Mar 14, 2017 · 8 comments
Closed

Does this support LTI 1.1 ? #104

banister opened this issue Mar 14, 2017 · 8 comments

Comments

@banister
Copy link

If not, do you know of another Ruby gem that supports LTI 1.1 ?

thanks in advance,this looks like a great project

@bracken
Copy link
Contributor

bracken commented Mar 15, 2017

Yes, it supports LTI 1.1, that is, the ability to send an outcome result

@rivernate
Copy link
Contributor

The 1.x branch has support for outcome results, the 2.x.* branches don't currently have support.

@banister
Copy link
Author

Thanks. Do you also have support for sending the basic launch and OAuth signing of the payload (for 1.1 basic launch) ?

@rivernate
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, it does have helper methods for creating a signed lti message

@banister
Copy link
Author

banister commented Apr 24, 2017

@rivernate thanks, however i can't seem to find the relevant methods in the library. I am trying to generate an http POST payload for the lti launch link, would you be able to point to the relevant methods i use to manage the oauth side of things? and if possible, an example of how to use it? thanks!

@bgibso4
Copy link

bgibso4 commented Jun 1, 2017

^I also have this question

@gordonbisnor
Copy link

Would be nice to get some documentation for this library –– I would be happy to fill in some details if I can figure it out. Currently trying to build an LTI product using content-item message and not sure how to do the Content Item Selection POST back to the tool consumer.

@rivernate
Copy link
Contributor

Duplicate of #141

@rivernate rivernate marked this as a duplicate of #141 Nov 13, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants