You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There's a bunch of Infineon devices in the library with the footprint INFINEON PG-HSOF-8-1. This footprint uses the convention of G,D,S for the designators, instead of the numbering scheme set by the datasheets.
By contrast the symbol used in all of these transistors is INFINEON MOSFET N-CH HSOF, which uses the numbering scheme from the datasheet.
For some reason the library also contains a symbol named INFINEON MOSFET IPT059N15N3, that does not comply with the formatting conventions for most symbols, but which does use the G,D,S, and I'm guessing came first with the footprint.
We should either modify the symbols to match the footprint, modify the footprint to match the symbols, or rename INFINEON MOSFET IPT059N15N3 to INFINEON MOSFET HSOF-8-1 or something similar and modify the DB to use that symbol for al Infineon HSOF-8 MOSFETs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There's a bunch of Infineon devices in the library with the footprint
INFINEON PG-HSOF-8-1
. This footprint uses the convention of G,D,S for the designators, instead of the numbering scheme set by the datasheets.By contrast the symbol used in all of these transistors is
INFINEON MOSFET N-CH HSOF
, which uses the numbering scheme from the datasheet.For some reason the library also contains a symbol named
INFINEON MOSFET IPT059N15N3
, that does not comply with the formatting conventions for most symbols, but which does use the G,D,S, and I'm guessing came first with the footprint.We should either modify the symbols to match the footprint, modify the footprint to match the symbols, or rename
INFINEON MOSFET IPT059N15N3
toINFINEON MOSFET HSOF-8-1
or something similar and modify the DB to use that symbol for al Infineon HSOF-8 MOSFETs.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: