I copied this text from jashkenas/backbone#4268, so if you recognize it, that is not a coincidence.
I have taken on the burden of maintaining Underscore. I also happen to believe that ideally, each code change should be reviewed by somebody other than the author.
When somebody else submits a pull request (please do!), I can obviously review it. When I submit a pull request myself (which I do a lot), it is not so obvious who might review it.
So far, I've been blindly @mentioning people who I thought (or hoped) might be interested in reviewing. I now feel that this pattern is not sustainable; I will miss people who are interested and annoy people who are not. Instead, I would like to actually know which people are interested in reviewing.
Of course, I'm hoping that expert contributors are interested, but non-expert reviewers are welcome, too. The more reviewers, the better.
Text replies for other reasons also welcome, of course.
I copied this text from jashkenas/backbone#4268, so if you recognize it, that is not a coincidence.
I have taken on the burden of maintaining Underscore. I also happen to believe that ideally, each code change should be reviewed by somebody other than the author.
When somebody else submits a pull request (please do!), I can obviously review it. When I submit a pull request myself (which I do a lot), it is not so obvious who might review it.
So far, I've been blindly
@mentioning people who I thought (or hoped) might be interested in reviewing. I now feel that this pattern is not sustainable; I will miss people who are interested and annoy people who are not. Instead, I would like to actually know which people are interested in reviewing.Of course, I'm hoping that expert contributors are interested, but non-expert reviewers are welcome, too. The more reviewers, the better.
@mentioned to draw your attention, leave a 🚀.Text replies for other reasons also welcome, of course.