[Bug]: Weight matrix incorrect titles

[girts-bohvalovs]

JASP Version

0.19.3

Commit ID

No response

JASP Module

Network

What analysis are you seeing the problem on?

Weights matrix

What OS are you seeing the problem on?

Windows 11

Bug Description

Network analysis weights matrix provides incorrect sequence of variable names or their values.

Expected Behaviour

Matrix weight variables names should have been in a sequence of provided in the legend. Please see the excel file where the error is shown with the correct solution.
error-matrix-weights.xlsx
![network](https://github.com/user-attachment

s/assets/9c667ccf-e7cf-4b67-9c69-7171a4856ffa)

Steps to Reproduce

1. Load data
2. Go to network analysis
3. Select weights matrix
4. The represent weights and network analysis image do not match, but the centrality variables sum to values of precision 0.001. To fix this issue user has to manually adjust the variables names in a different software, for example in Excel.

Log (if any)

No response

More Debug Information

-------- Application Info --------
JASP Version: JASP 0.19.3
Build Branch: 0.19.3
Build Date: Jan 3 2025 12:53:34 (Netherlands)
Last Commit: c8710df5442149527b0692cc1367ea5b3c982d04

-------- Basic Info --------
Operating System: Windows 11 Version 24H2
Product Version: 11
Kernel Type: winnt
Kernel Version: 10.0.26100
Architecture: x86_64
Install Path: C:/Program Files (x86)/JASP
Platfotm Name: windows
System Local: en_US

-------- Extra Info --------
Current code page
Active code page: 437
Active code page: 65001

Host Name: MSI
OS Name: Microsoft Windows 11 Home
OS Version: 10.0.26100 N/A Build 26100
OS Manufacturer: Microsoft Corporation
OS Configuration: Standalone Workstation
OS Build Type: Multiprocessor Free
Registered Owner: [email protected]
Registered Organization:
Product ID: 00342-22164-07328-AAOEM
Original Install Date: 12/4/2024, 17:23:43
System Boot Time: 1/4/2025, 14:41:26
System Manufacturer: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd.
System Model: Thin GF63 12VE
System Type: x64-based PC
Processor(s): 1 Processor(s) Installed.
[01]: Intel64 Family 6 Model 154 Stepping 3 GenuineIntel ~2300 Mhz
BIOS Version: American Megatrends International, LLC. E16R8IMS.10D, 6/27/2023
Windows Directory: C:\WINDOWS
System Directory: C:\WINDOWS\system32
Boot Device: \Device\HarddiskVolume1
System Locale: en-us;English (United States)
Input Locale: lv;Latvian
Time Zone: (UTC+02:00) Helsinki, Kyiv, Riga, Sofia, Tallinn, Vilnius
Total Physical Memory: 16085 MB
Available Physical Memory: 7283 MB
Virtual Memory: Max Size: 19925 MB
Virtual Memory: Available: 7479 MB
Virtual Memory: In Use: 12446 MB
Page File Location(s): C:\pagefile.sys
Domain: WORKGROUP
Logon Server: \MSI
Hotfix(s): 3 Hotfix(s) Installed.
[01]: KB5048162
[02]: KB5048667
[03]: KB5049685
Network Card(s): 3 NIC(s) Installed.
[01]: Intel(R) Wi-Fi 6 AX201 160MHz
Connection Name: Wi-Fi
DHCP Enabled: Yes
DHCP Server:
IP address(es)

                           [02]: Bluetooth Device (Personal Area Network)
                                 Connection Name: Bluetooth Network Connection
                                 Status:          Media disconnected
                           [03]: Realtek PCIe GbE Family Controller
                                 Connection Name: Ethernet
                                 Status:          Media disconnected

Virtualization-based security: Status: Running
Required Security Properties:
Available Security Properties:
Base Virtualization Support
Secure Boot
DMA Protection
UEFI Code Readonly
SMM Security Mitigations 1.0
Mode Based Execution Control
APIC Virtualization
Services Configured:
Hypervisor enforced Code Integrity
Services Running:
Hypervisor enforced Code Integrity
App Control for Business policy: Enforced
App Control for Business user mode policy: Off
Security Features Enabled:
Hyper-V Requirements: A hypervisor has been detected. Features required for Hyper-V will not be displayed.

Final Checklist

• I have included a screenshot showcasing the issue, if possible.
• I have included a JASP file (zipped) or data file that causes the crash/bug, if applicable.
• I have accurately described the bug, and steps to reproduce it.

[tomtomme]

@girts-bohvalovs
thx for the report.
I can confirm this on 0.19.3 flatpak.
There is an easier workaround however. The weights matrix respects the order of the variables you put in the "dependent variables" field. Reorder them there and the weights matix gets adjusted. So the alphabetic order there is important to get a correct output and therefore I consider this one of a "high prio" to fix. Lets hope 0.20 will make things better. But it may need half a year until released.