Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[OPENJDK-3053] Aggregating JAVA_OPTS_APPEND #494

Open
ciis0 opened this issue May 17, 2024 · 10 comments
Open

[OPENJDK-3053] Aggregating JAVA_OPTS_APPEND #494

ciis0 opened this issue May 17, 2024 · 10 comments

Comments

@ciis0
Copy link
Contributor

ciis0 commented May 17, 2024

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OPENJDK-3053


Hi,

we are using these images in kustomize-based kubernetes deployments.

while kustomize can merge ConfigMaps, i.e. "VAL=foo" in a CM in the "base" can be overwritten by "VAL=bar" in an "overlay") it cannot merge variables -- if we have JAVA_OPTS_APPEND (or JAVA_OPTS for that matter) in one place, we can only overwrite it, but not extend it.

e.g. if we have a "base" with JAVA_OPTS_APPEND=-Dmyoption=foo and we would like to add -DanotherOption=bar in the "overlay", that requires to put JAVA_OPTS_APPEND=-Dmyoption=foo -Dmyoption=bar into the overlay.

Would you accept a PR that introduces a way to aggregate JAVA_OPTS_APPEND like the following?

# export syntax for easier toying around in shell
export JAVA_OPTS_APPEND_2_BASE_OPTS="-Done.option=foo -Danother.option=bar"
export JAVA_OPTS_APPEND_1_EARLY_OPTS="-XX:-HeapDumpOnOutOfMemoryError"
export JAVA_OPTS_APPEND_3_CACERTS="-Djavax.net.ssl.trustStore=/media/configmap/cacerts/cacerts -Djavax.net.ssl.trustStorePassword=changedit"
export JAVA_OPTS_APPEND_100_END_OPTS="-XX:+HeapDumpOnOutOfMemoryError -XX:HeapDumpPath=/media/pvc/heapdumps"

result (where i would prefer to have this (natural) order, but depending on the complexity no order guarantees might be given):

JAVA_OPTS_APPEND=-XX:-HeapDumpOnOutOfMemoryError -Done.option=foo -Danother.option=bar -Djavax.net.ssl.trustStore=/media/configmap/cacerts/cacerts -Djavax.net.ssl.trustStorePassword=changedit -XX:+HeapDumpOnOutOfMemoryError -XX:HeapDumpPath=/media/pvc/heapdumps

simple, without natural order:

shopt -s extglob
appends=$(compgen -v JAVA_OPTS_APPEND_)
for append in $appends
do JAVA_OPTS_APPEND="$JAVA_OPTS_APPEND ${!append}"
done

likely the logic should back-off when JAVA_OPTS_APPEND is already set.

advanced, natural order and enforced numeric infix to prevent unexpected ordering (which could also help warning about clashes):

shopt -s extglob
appends=$(compgen -v -X '!JAVA_OPTS_APPEND_+([[:digit:]])_*' | sort -V)
for append in $appends
do JAVA_OPTS_APPEND="$JAVA_OPTS_APPEND ${!append}"
done

additionally to backing off when already set, likely extglob should be set only temporarily to prevent unexpected side-effects in other scripts.

I verified both options with ubi8/openjdk-17-runtime:1.19-4.1715070687 already.

@ciis0
Copy link
Contributor Author

ciis0 commented May 17, 2024

if [ -z "${JAVA_OPTS_APPEND}" ]; then

    shopt -s extglob
    declare -A seen

    appends=$(compgen -v -X '!JAVA_OPTS_APPEND_+([[:digit:]])_*' | sort -V)
    echo -e "Generating JAVA_OPTS_APPENDS from:\n$appends"

    for append in $appends; do

        JAVA_OPTS_APPEND="$JAVA_OPTS_APPEND ${!append}"

        pat="JAVA_OPTS_APPEND_([0-9]+)_(.*)"
        if [[ "$append" =~ $pat ]]; then
            seen[${BASH_REMATCH[1]}]="${seen[${BASH_REMATCH[1]}]} ${BASH_REMATCH[0]}"
        fi
    done

    JAVA_OPTS_APPEND=$(echo "${JAVA_OPTS_APPEND}" | awk '$1=$1')

    for saw in ${!seen[*]}
    do
        elem=(${seen[$saw]})
        if [ ${#elem[*]} -gt 1 ]; then
            echo "Collision for JAVA_OPTS_APPEND_$saw? ${elem[@]}"
        fi
    done

    echo generated JAVA_OPTS_APPEND=$JAVA_OPTS_APPEND

fi
Generating JAVA_OPTS_APPENDS from:
JAVA_OPTS_APPEND_1_EARLY_OPTS
JAVA_OPTS_APPEND_2_BASE_OPTS
JAVA_OPTS_APPEND_3_CACERTS
JAVA_OPTS_APPEND_100_END_OPTS
generated JAVA_OPTS_APPEND=-XX:-HeapDumpOnOutOfMemoryError -Done.option=foo -Danother.option=bar -Djavax.net.ssl.trustStore=/media/configmap/cacerts/cacerts -Djavax.net.ssl.trustStorePassword=changedit -XX:+HeapDumpOnOutOfMemoryError -XX:HeapDumpPath=/media/pvc/heapdumps

@jmtd
Copy link
Member

jmtd commented May 20, 2024

I sympathise with the problem, but I'd like to explore some other ways of solving it.

As I understand it, you have <openjdk image><base1><base2>, and each of <base1> and <base2> want to append JVM options. Is that right?

For some time I've wanted to de-couple some of functional areas of the run script, and this could be an opportunity to do so. What if you could drop a script into a known path to add to the JVM arguments? Something like (simplified)

get_java_options() {
  local opts

  for scriptlet in "$JBOSS_CONTAINER_JAVA_RUN_MODULE/opts.d"/*; do
    opts="$opts $($scriptlet)"
  done

  echo "${opts} ${JAVA_OPTS_APPEND}"
}

PoC
ubi9...jmtd:gh-494-jvm-args#diff-e38c49939e67e17236485b64a7afc257e6b78a92f42e9654aac965f225fb00a4

@ciis0
Copy link
Contributor Author

ciis0 commented May 21, 2024

For some time I've wanted to de-couple some of functional areas of the run script, and this could be an opportunity to do so. What if you could drop a script into a known path to add to the JVM arguments?

That would be fine, too!

I would drop my script there then. :)

@ciis0
Copy link
Contributor Author

ciis0 commented Jun 10, 2024

Any updates on this?

@jmtd
Copy link
Member

jmtd commented Jun 11, 2024

I haven't returned to it yet, sorry. We've just completed shipping an image update (:1.20) and it was too late to get on the slate for that, but, I think we can get this done for the next release. I've filed a corresponding JIRA so we can get it into consideration and I'm running the test suite against the PoC.

@jmtd jmtd changed the title Aggregating JAVA_OPTS_APPEND [OPENJDK-3053] Aggregating JAVA_OPTS_APPEND Jun 11, 2024
@ciis0
Copy link
Contributor Author

ciis0 commented Jun 11, 2024

ok, thank you!

@ciis0
Copy link
Contributor Author

ciis0 commented Jun 28, 2024

Mainly curious, what is the time frame for 1.21, some place where I can help regarding this? :)

@ciis0
Copy link
Contributor Author

ciis0 commented Aug 28, 2024

any updates?

@jerboaa
Copy link
Contributor

jerboaa commented Aug 28, 2024

Unfortunately no. It might get to 2025 until we'll find some time to be able to ship this.

@ciis0
Copy link
Contributor Author

ciis0 commented Aug 28, 2024

ok, thanks for the info!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants