sf.kde alignment

[hsofaer]

Hi, I'm using sf.kde, and got results that didn't look right. I ran your meuse example, and those results are surprising to me too - I would have expected the brightest hotspot to be to the NW of where it is. I adjusted to bw = 100 and reran, and it still doesn't align under the points. Could the raster values be transposed across the diagonal? I noticed that there are three outliers in the NW in the raster but the outlying points are in the SE?
Appreciate it,
Helen

[jeffreyevans]

Helen, thank you for pointing this out. Due to changes in terra, dependent functions occasionally break. I will chase down what is going on and post a bug fix in the next few days. This function has been validated against other KDE outputs, so currently is not working as expected. Best, Jeff

…

________________________________ From: hsofaer ***@***.***> Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2026 6:22 PM To: jeffreyevans/spatialEco ***@***.***> Cc: Subscribed ***@***.***> Subject: [jeffreyevans/spatialEco] sf.kde alignment (Issue #72) [https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/45010664?s=20&v=4]hsofaer created an issue (jeffreyevans/spatialEco#72)<#72> Hi, I'm using sf.kde, and got results that didn't look right. I ran your meuse example, and those results are surprising to me too - I would have expected the brightest hotspot to be to the NW of where it is. I adjusted to bw = 100 and reran, and it still doesn't align under the points. Could the raster values be transposed across the diagonal? I noticed that there are three outliers in the NW in the raster but the outlying points are in the SE? Appreciate it, Helen image.png (view on web)<https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4c11af86-770e-4712-a2de-1b078923f165> — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#72>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACLKH7ZF7FA3XJAXQXV522T4PDJEPAVCNFSM6AAAAACWHLBD6OVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZUGAZDKMBZGU3DSNY>. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>