Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upload crate documentation somewhere and point crates.io there #1

Open
whitequark opened this issue Sep 20, 2016 · 8 comments
Open

Comments

@whitequark
Copy link

whitequark commented Sep 20, 2016

This is useful if I want to determine exactly which parts are available in core-io without trying to use them with rustc. Seems trivial as there's already a doc.sh script; so only Travis upload is needed.

@whitequark
Copy link
Author

whitequark commented Sep 20, 2016

To give an example, I'm using this .travis.yml script for doc upload. The "secure" string is a personal GitHub token, encoded with travis encrypt CLI tool; travis encrypt GH_TOKEN=00000...

@jethrogb
Copy link
Owner

I don't think the title of this issue matches what you're asking for?

@whitequark whitequark changed the title Point crates.io documentation to std Upload crate documentation somewhere and point crates.io there Sep 20, 2016
@whitequark
Copy link
Author

Sorry, I typoed. Fixed the title now.

To be clear on what I want: the "Documentation" link on https://crates.io/crates/core-io points to the Rust nightly documentation. I think it should point to generated documentation for this crate. Since it does not appear to currently exist anywhere, I suggest a way to upload it using Travis. I don't have a preference on where exactly it is.

@whitequark
Copy link
Author

whitequark commented Nov 1, 2016

As an alternative you could simply link here: https://docs.rs/crate/core_io.
Nevermind, that has failed to build the docs because they use a newer nightly...

@jethrogb
Copy link
Owner

jethrogb commented Nov 6, 2016

That works now with the latest release, but it doesn't let you select between features.

@whitequark
Copy link
Author

That's quite excellent already, and enough for my purposes. Thanks!

@dhardy
Copy link

dhardy commented Dec 8, 2017

Maybe you should fix the build on docs.rs and link there?

@jethrogb
Copy link
Owner

jethrogb commented Dec 8, 2017

It's quite hard to keep up to date with docs.rs because it's not known a priori which nightly they're using to build the docs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants