Citation at start of footnote generates a secondary footnote: intended behaviour? #9885
Unanswered
lyndondrake
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment
-
What pandoc version? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi,
If I have a footnote that is like this:
Pandoc generates a secondary footnote, which looks like this in Word:
It is missing both the citation for
@Eruera1997
and creates the non-intended footnote '1' inside the intended footnote '14'. A similar effect happens inLaTeX
, so I don't think it's an artefact of the Word writer. If I add text prior to@Eruera1997
I get an inline citation, which is what I was expecting, so it seems to be specific to the first element of a footnote being a citation.Is this intended behaviour, and if so is there anything I can do to force an inline citation?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions