You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Funders and academic employers are increasingly interested in seeing evidence for the impact academic research generates. For software such as {cbcTools}, this is hard to accomplish because the typical metrics for promotion and tenure that matter (publications, grants, and citations) don't really apply. The consequence is that there are increasingly fewer and fewer incentives to develop packages like {cbcTools} 😞
The good news is you can help! If you have found {cbcTools} useful in any regard, please leave feedback here for other users, funders, and employers to view. This helps the package authors show how {cbcTools} is being used by academic and non-academic users to increase their productivity and work quality.
So please contribute some praise 😁! Tell us how cool this package is and how you use it in your work!
And if you write a paper using {cbcTools}, please cite the package in your publications, see: citation("cbcTools")
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Dr. Helveston, a lot of thanks for your incredible and amazing work. I will use each package, cbcTools & logitr in my work.
For me and my work, finding these two packages and especially the documentation resources both on YouTube and in the packages themselves has made me see and understand concepts that were a little forgotten, and disordered in my mind.
I will surely cite all your works in the publications that may arise. Thanks again.
Funders and academic employers are increasingly interested in seeing evidence for the impact academic research generates. For software such as {cbcTools}, this is hard to accomplish because the typical metrics for promotion and tenure that matter (publications, grants, and citations) don't really apply. The consequence is that there are increasingly fewer and fewer incentives to develop packages like {cbcTools} 😞
The good news is you can help! If you have found {cbcTools} useful in any regard, please leave feedback here for other users, funders, and employers to view. This helps the package authors show how {cbcTools} is being used by academic and non-academic users to increase their productivity and work quality.
So please contribute some praise 😁! Tell us how cool this package is and how you use it in your work!
And if you write a paper using {cbcTools}, please cite the package in your publications, see:
citation("cbcTools")
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: