Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pore prune should move back to upstream #33

Open
jmgao opened this issue Jun 28, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

pore prune should move back to upstream #33

jmgao opened this issue Jun 28, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@jmgao
Copy link
Owner

jmgao commented Jun 28, 2019

If the current branch gets abandoned, we just detach and stay where we were instead of moving back to the upstream.

@jmgao jmgao changed the title pore abandon should move back to upstream pore prune should move back to upstream Jul 16, 2019
@jmgao
Copy link
Owner Author

jmgao commented Jul 16, 2019

(pore abandon doesn't even exist yet)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant