You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Imagine a SHACL graph (S, shacl.jsonld, published on the Web) that defines the graph structure for a particular vocabulary V that is defined through a JSON-LD @context (C, jsonldcontext.jsonld, published on the Web).
Then a JSON-LD document (D, document.jsonld) that uses vocabulary V, thus references C and wants to reference S as the way to validate the proper structure of the graph produced. Is there a way, best practice of referencing S within D so that it can be discovered by a processor of D?
Thank you very much for your help
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I know that people have also discussed annotation of a JSON-LD Context... note that a JSON-LD Context is just another JSON-LD Document that can contain statements about the context itself. This could be another place where you could list "acceptable data shapes". All that said, I don't think the community has settled on a best practice, nor a generalized solution, yet.
Dear all,
The case is the following:
Imagine a SHACL graph (S, shacl.jsonld, published on the Web) that defines the graph structure for a particular vocabulary V that is defined through a JSON-LD
@context
(C, jsonldcontext.jsonld, published on the Web).Then a JSON-LD document (D, document.jsonld) that uses vocabulary V, thus references C and wants to reference S as the way to validate the proper structure of the graph produced. Is there a way, best practice of referencing S within D so that it can be discovered by a processor of D?
Thank you very much for your help
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: