Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Increase code coverage #24

Open
jumpinjackie opened this issue Jan 26, 2017 · 1 comment
Open

Increase code coverage #24

jumpinjackie opened this issue Jan 26, 2017 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@jumpinjackie
Copy link
Owner

Now that we have code coverage set up, let's get this percentage up from its current value of 11%

jumpinjackie added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 27, 2017
jumpinjackie added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 27, 2017
jumpinjackie added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 27, 2017
jumpinjackie added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 27, 2017
@jumpinjackie
Copy link
Owner Author

Need to find out how to ignore the autogenerated XML classes as they contribute to a significant portion of un-covered code

jumpinjackie added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 26, 2017
- #24: Add tests for:
  - GdalConfigurationDocument
  - RuntimeMapLayerCollection
  - RuntimeMapGroupCollection
jumpinjackie added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 20, 2021
jumpinjackie added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 20, 2021
…as discovered that the WKT defn for WGS84.PseudoMeractor in MGOS 4.0 slightly differs from previousl releases. The DefaultSimpleTransform has been refactored to check for an *array* of WKT definitions of WGS84.PseudoMercator instead of a single instance.
jumpinjackie added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 21, 2021
…face to faciliate mockability, allowing us to add unit tests for HttpServerConnection where required.
jumpinjackie added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 23, 2021
…aestroAPI internals to the test suite library
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant