-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rework of start.sh script, take 2 #1512
Conversation
bc5f5fb
to
c37d4d7
Compare
For my reference: build TEST_IMAGE="base-notebook" pytest -m "not info" base-notebook/test Docker tests are passing. |
@maresb could you please rebase on the latest master? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I will take a look today or tomorrow, this is quite a big change 👍
4b3ec34
to
4ef8a78
Compare
@mathbunnyru thanks for the CI fix! Seems to be running now after rebase. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this PR is great, there are only minor cleanups, and my lack of knowledge of bash :)
Could you please take a look?
@consideRatio as this was your PR originally, could you please also check that everything seems OK to you? |
@maresb @consideRatio great work 👍 @maresb also, please, let's not rebase anymore (because I want to be able to see incremental changes and it doesn't work well with rebases). All the previous rebases were perfectly fine because it was kind of WIP and I didn't review the changes back then. |
Co-authored-by: Ayaz Salikhov <[email protected]>
@mathbunnyru, agreed on the rebasing. My brain is dizzy from all the merge conflicts I had to resolve. I'd like to take another review pass myself. I haven't had the chance to reexamine the changes yet as a whole. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, I just made a small consistency tweak
Co-authored-by: Erik Sundell <[email protected]>
@maresb ❤️ 🎉 thanks for following up so thoroughly with this and being patient with review comments! @mathbunnyru since you have approved this already, I'll go for a merge at this point! I also triple verified that the latest commit that updated an echo statement shouldn't cause something to crash, and skip waiting for tests to succeed as the commit before passed. |
Towards fixing #1270 I am convinced by @consideRatio's approach in #1052.
His #1052 grew quite large, and generated a lot of interesting discussion. It also introduced some very valuable enhancements to
start.sh
to improve comments, messages, and make it more robust.I have rebased a subset of his commits which I consider less controvertial. In theory, they should not significantly change anything except for the messages, but several edge cases should now be handled better.
I hope that this can be tested and approved. Then I hope to