Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

hdi question #39

Open
Neon22 opened this issue Apr 23, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

hdi question #39

Neon22 opened this issue Apr 23, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@Neon22
Copy link

Neon22 commented Apr 23, 2020

Great work thanks for doing this.
My question is about the hdi which purports to show the uncertainty in the derived Rt.
It looks perfectly reasonable to me but if we look at the country data run through the same process here:

and we look specifically at New Zealand which has a high testing rate and low infection rate - due to lockdown and cluster management - then we see the hdi increasing.

image where hdi seems wrong

This seems to mean we might be drawing the wrong conclusions about uncertainty.

Is there a way to factor in the testing per head of population here ?
Is that even the right thing to do ?
or is the low number of positive cases screwing up something else ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant