You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm just wondering what this gives us that a simple rate of growth in cases doesn't. E.g., the interval ranges seem to be extremely narrow and therefor are not predictive of the future spread. A simple calculation of (total cases today)/(total cases yesterday) seems to be a fairly accurate predictor of case growth over the next few days. I haven't done the calculation, but looking at WA data, this Rt model is out of sync with the actual daily number of total cases. E.g. Rt went high for WA a few days ago, yes actual number of cases has still be growing slowly by about 1-2% a day., lowest of all 50 states except VT.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm just wondering what this gives us that a simple rate of growth in cases doesn't. E.g., the interval ranges seem to be extremely narrow and therefor are not predictive of the future spread. A simple calculation of (total cases today)/(total cases yesterday) seems to be a fairly accurate predictor of case growth over the next few days. I haven't done the calculation, but looking at WA data, this Rt model is out of sync with the actual daily number of total cases. E.g. Rt went high for WA a few days ago, yes actual number of cases has still be growing slowly by about 1-2% a day., lowest of all 50 states except VT.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: