Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue with port width evaluation formula with parenthesis #108

Closed
Kyrhe opened this issue Feb 20, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

Issue with port width evaluation formula with parenthesis #108

Kyrhe opened this issue Feb 20, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@Kyrhe
Copy link

Kyrhe commented Feb 20, 2024

Category

Bug

Description:

When adding port width with parenthesis, the formula evaluation breaks. First parenthesis is lost and terms are added in incorrect order, parameters are also lost. This applies only for first filling of field.

for example (3-1)-1 evaluates to -1)3-1, while 3-1-1 evaluates correctly.

Though tool is fine when you first enter the formula without parenthesis, then enter, then edit to add only the parenthesis.

It would seem it might be some kind of initialization issue, as I repeated testing to a field enough times, it started to evaluate results correctly every time.

Kactus2 version

3.13.1

OS

Win10

IPXACT standard

2022

@hagantsa hagantsa added the bug label May 15, 2024
hagantsa added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 3, 2024
…ting pre-existing value or a section of the value. Should fix issue #108.
@hagantsa
Copy link
Collaborator

hagantsa commented Jul 4, 2024

Should now be fixed in 8fd2ee3.

@hagantsa hagantsa closed this as completed Jul 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants