Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Why would volatility be a problem for arbitraging? #16

Open
adrianog opened this issue Jun 23, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

Why would volatility be a problem for arbitraging? #16

adrianog opened this issue Jun 23, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@adrianog
Copy link

Hi

Thanks for the useful resource.

Question:
You seem to imply that high volatility is not conducive to fruitful arbitraging, whereas my understanding was the opposite - that the volatility is creating the arbitrage opportunities.
Would you mind expanding on the topic?

Many thanks

@kelvinau
Copy link
Owner

That is true, in some way. High volatility creates a lot of arbitrage opportunities to an extent. When there's no limit how much the price can go up or down, that's a different story. Take bitcoin as an example. It reached $19k in December and dropped to $12k in two weeks. Let's say you had 1 BTC (worth $19k in Dec.) to begin with and you spotted a lot of arbitrage opportunities. You made 0.5 BTC in two weeks, so at the end you would have 1.5 BTC, but that would be worth only $18k ($12k * 1.5). What did you earn? You actually lost $1k because of the huge price dropping. Of course if you made more BTC, you would probably be still earning, but just making less profit - only if there were a lot of opportunities. Some can say that you should never hold BTC, or should convert some to fiat currency immediately or regularly, but that will be another discussion of fiat-to-crypto conversion.

Now it's relatively more stable than in December. I think It could be a good time to re-look at the opportunities. As always, trade at your own risk.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants