Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Querying monitors for DDC/CI capabilities #58

Open
bland328 opened this issue Oct 29, 2019 · 5 comments
Open

Querying monitors for DDC/CI capabilities #58

bland328 opened this issue Oct 29, 2019 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@bland328
Copy link

The Linux tools dcci-tool (https://github.com/bhuvanchandra/ddcci.git) and ddccontrol (https://github.com/ddccontrol/ddccontrol) both have the ability to query a monitor about its capabilities by sending an 0xf3 command (which they both call DDCCI_COMMAND_CAPS).

Seems like a great ability for ddcctl to have! So logical, in fact, that I can't help but fear there's a technical reason it isn't already in there.

Before I take a stab at it, I'm hoping @kfix or someone else might be able to tell me if it is already known to be unworkable under macOS, in which case I won't waste my time :) Thanks!

@kfix
Copy link
Owner

kfix commented Oct 31, 2019

I was not aware of that command, and I'm assuming the creator of DDC.c wasn't either (or tried but failed and didn't make a note)

@bland328
Copy link
Author

Thanks very much for the response. I'll take a shot at it one of these days.

@kfix
Copy link
Owner

kfix commented Jan 10, 2021

This seems like a very good idea.

It appears sending unsupported commands could potentially brick a monitor (#89)

@kfix kfix self-assigned this Jan 10, 2021
@ruslan-ardashev
Copy link

Also interested in this feature!

@ssbarnea
Copy link

How big is that risk? We do know know that living does incur a certain risk of death, but we still try to do it anyway.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants