Create snyk-security.yml

[khulnasoft-bot]

User description

Category:

One of: Bugfix / Feature / Code style update / Refactoring Only / Build related changes / Documentation / Other (please specify)

Overview

Briefly outline your new changes...

Issue Number (if applicable) #00

New Vars (if applicable)

If you've added any new build scripts, environmental variables, config file options, dependency or devDependency, please outline here

Screenshot (if applicable)

If you've introduced any significant UI changes, please include a screenshot

Code Quality Checklist (Please complete)

• All changes are backwards compatible
• All lint checks and tests are passing
• There are no (new) build warnings or errors
• (If a new config option is added) Attribute is outlined in the schema and documented
• (If a new dependency is added) Package is essential, and has been checked out for security or performance
• (If significant change) Bumps version in package.json

---

PR Type

enhancement, configuration changes

---

Description

• Introduced a new GitHub Actions workflow to integrate Snyk security analysis into the CI/CD pipeline.
• Configured the workflow to perform security checks using Snyk CLI across various components including code, open source dependencies, containers, and infrastructure as code.
• Enabled the upload of Snyk Code results to GitHub Security Code Scanning for enhanced security visibility.
• Added steps to build a Docker image and monitor it using Snyk Container analysis.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files

Configuration changes

snyk-security.yml Add Snyk security analysis GitHub Actions workflow              .github/workflows/snyk-security.yml Added a GitHub Actions workflow for Snyk security analysis. Configured Snyk CLI setup for security checks on code, open source, container, and infrastructure. Integrated Snyk results with GitHub Security Code Scanning. Included steps for Docker image build and Snyk Container monitoring. +79/-0

---

💡 PR-Agent usage:
Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

[sourcery-ai]

We have skipped reviewing this pull request. It seems to have been created by a bot (hey, khulnasoft-bot!). We assume it knows what it's doing!

[codiumai-pr-agent-pro]

PR-Agent was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your git user with your CodiumAI identity here.

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪

🧪 No relevant tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ Key issues to review Potential Security Risk The Snyk token is referenced as a secret, but its actual value should be verified to ensure it's properly secured. Possible Configuration Issue The Docker image name 'your/image-to-test' appears to be a placeholder and should be replaced with the actual image name for the project. Commented Code There are commented-out lines for Node.js setup. If Node.js is required for the project, these lines should be uncommented and configured properly.

[codiumai-pr-agent-free]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪

🧪 No relevant tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ Key issues to review Potential Security Risk The Snyk token is referenced as a secret, but its actual value should be verified to ensure it's properly secured. Possible Configuration Issue The Docker image name 'your/image-to-test' appears to be a placeholder and should be replaced with the actual image name for the project. Commented Code There are commented-out lines for Node.js setup. If Node.js is not needed, these comments could be removed for clarity.

[codiumai-pr-agent-pro]

PR-Agent was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your git user with your CodiumAI identity here.

CI Failure Feedback 🧐

Action: build

Failed stage: Get Compressed Size [❌]

Failure summary: The action failed due to an error in the npm install process: The package.json file could not be found at the specified path: /home/runner/work/khulnasoft-repo-template/khulnasoft-repo-template/package.json. This resulted in an ENOENT error, indicating that the file or directory does not exist. The npm command exited with code 254 due to this missing file.

Relevant error logs: 1: ##[group]Operating System 2: Ubuntu ... 332: show-total: true 333: collapse-unchanged: true 334: ##[endgroup] 335: PR #5 is targeted at master (master) 336: Stripping hash from build chunks using '\\b\\w{8}\\.' pattern. 337: ##[group][current] Install Dependencies 338: Installing using npm install 339: [command]/usr/local/bin/npm install 340: npm error code ENOENT 341: npm error syscall open 342: npm error path /home/runner/work/khulnasoft-repo-template/khulnasoft-repo-template/package.json 343: npm error errno -2 344: npm error enoent Could not read package.json: Error: ENOENT: no such file or directory, open '/home/runner/work/khulnasoft-repo-template/khulnasoft-repo-template/package.json' 345: npm error enoent This is related to npm not being able to find a file. 346: npm error enoent 347: npm error A complete log of this run can be found in: /home/runner/.npm/_logs/2024-09-09T21_22_40_896Z-debug-0.log 348: ##[error]The process '/usr/local/bin/npm' failed with exit code 254

---

✨ CI feedback usage guide:

---

The CI feedback tool (/checks) automatically triggers when a PR has a failed check.
The tool analyzes the failed checks and provides several feedbacks:

• Failed stage
• Failed test name
• Failure summary
• Relevant error logs

In addition to being automatically triggered, the tool can also be invoked manually by commenting on a PR:

/checks "https://github.com/{repo_name}/actions/runs/{run_number}/job/{job_number}"

where {repo_name} is the name of the repository, {run_number} is the run number of the failed check, and {job_number} is the job number of the failed check.

Configuration options

• enable_auto_checks_feedback - if set to true, the tool will automatically provide feedback when a check is failed. Default is true.
• excluded_checks_list - a list of checks to exclude from the feedback, for example: ["check1", "check2"]. Default is an empty list.
• enable_help_text - if set to true, the tool will provide a help message with the feedback. Default is true.
• persistent_comment - if set to true, the tool will overwrite a previous checks comment with the new feedback. Default is true.
• final_update_message - if persistent_comment is true and updating a previous checks message, the tool will also create a new message: "Persistent checks updated to latest commit". Default is true.

See more information about the checks tool in the docs.

[codiumai-pr-agent-pro]

PR-Agent was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your git user with your CodiumAI identity here.

CI Failure Feedback 🧐

Action: comment

Failed stage: Label Commenter [❌]

Failure summary: The action failed because the configuration file .github/issue-auto-comments.yml was not found. This file is necessary for the action to execute properly.

Relevant error logs: 1: ##[group]Operating System 2: Ubuntu ... 204: ##[endgroup] 205: [INFO] Version 1.10.0 206: [INFO] Usage https://github.com/peaceiris/actions-label-commenter#readme 207: [INFO] event name: pull_request_target 208: [INFO] config file path: .github/issue-auto-comments.yml 209: [INFO] label name: configuration changes 210: [INFO] label event: labeled 211: [INFO] issue number: 5 212: ##[error]Action failed with error "not found .github/issue-auto-comments.yml"

---

✨ CI feedback usage guide:

---

The CI feedback tool (/checks) automatically triggers when a PR has a failed check.
The tool analyzes the failed checks and provides several feedbacks:

• Failed stage
• Failed test name
• Failure summary
• Relevant error logs

In addition to being automatically triggered, the tool can also be invoked manually by commenting on a PR:

/checks "https://github.com/{repo_name}/actions/runs/{run_number}/job/{job_number}"

where {repo_name} is the name of the repository, {run_number} is the run number of the failed check, and {job_number} is the job number of the failed check.

Configuration options

• enable_auto_checks_feedback - if set to true, the tool will automatically provide feedback when a check is failed. Default is true.
• excluded_checks_list - a list of checks to exclude from the feedback, for example: ["check1", "check2"]. Default is an empty list.
• enable_help_text - if set to true, the tool will provide a help message with the feedback. Default is true.
• persistent_comment - if set to true, the tool will overwrite a previous checks comment with the new feedback. Default is true.
• final_update_message - if persistent_comment is true and updating a previous checks message, the tool will also create a new message: "Persistent checks updated to latest commit". Default is true.

See more information about the checks tool in the docs.

[codiumai-pr-agent-pro]

PR-Agent was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your git user with your CodiumAI identity here.

CI Failure Feedback 🧐

Action: comment

Failed stage: Label Commenter [❌]

Failure summary: The action failed because the configuration file .github/issue-auto-comments.yml was not found. This file is required for the action to execute properly.

Relevant error logs: 1: ##[group]Operating System 2: Ubuntu ... 204: ##[endgroup] 205: [INFO] Version 1.10.0 206: [INFO] Usage https://github.com/peaceiris/actions-label-commenter#readme 207: [INFO] event name: pull_request_target 208: [INFO] config file path: .github/issue-auto-comments.yml 209: [INFO] label name: enhancement 210: [INFO] label event: labeled 211: [INFO] issue number: 5 212: ##[error]Action failed with error "not found .github/issue-auto-comments.yml"

---

✨ CI feedback usage guide:

---

The CI feedback tool (/checks) automatically triggers when a PR has a failed check.
The tool analyzes the failed checks and provides several feedbacks:

• Failed stage
• Failed test name
• Failure summary
• Relevant error logs

In addition to being automatically triggered, the tool can also be invoked manually by commenting on a PR:

/checks "https://github.com/{repo_name}/actions/runs/{run_number}/job/{job_number}"

where {repo_name} is the name of the repository, {run_number} is the run number of the failed check, and {job_number} is the job number of the failed check.

Configuration options

• enable_auto_checks_feedback - if set to true, the tool will automatically provide feedback when a check is failed. Default is true.
• excluded_checks_list - a list of checks to exclude from the feedback, for example: ["check1", "check2"]. Default is an empty list.
• enable_help_text - if set to true, the tool will provide a help message with the feedback. Default is true.
• persistent_comment - if set to true, the tool will overwrite a previous checks comment with the new feedback. Default is true.
• final_update_message - if persistent_comment is true and updating a previous checks message, the tool will also create a new message: "Persistent checks updated to latest commit". Default is true.

See more information about the checks tool in the docs.

[codiumai-pr-agent-free]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Latest suggestions up to ef52eef

Category	Suggestion	Score
Security	Uncomment the Snyk Code test step to enable SAST analysis Consider uncommenting the Snyk Code test step to ensure that SAST analysis is performed and results are uploaded to GitHub. .github/workflows/snyk-security.yml [57] -run: snyk code test --sarif > snyk-code.sarif # || true +run: snyk code test --sarif > snyk-code.sarif || true Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 Why: Enabling the Snyk Code test step ensures that SAST analysis is performed, which is crucial for identifying security vulnerabilities in the code.	9
	Uncomment the Snyk IaC test step to enable Infrastructure as Code analysis Consider uncommenting the Snyk IaC test step to ensure that Infrastructure as Code analysis is performed and results are reported. .github/workflows/snyk-security.yml [66] -run: snyk iac test --report # || true +run: snyk iac test --report || true Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 Why: Enabling the Snyk IaC test step is important for performing Infrastructure as Code analysis, which helps in identifying potential security issues in infrastructure configurations.	9
Best practice	Use a specific version tag for the Snyk setup action instead of a commit hash Consider using a specific version for the Snyk setup action instead of a commit hash. This improves readability and makes it easier to update in the future. .github/workflows/snyk-security.yml [42] -uses: snyk/actions/setup@806182742461562b67788a64410098c9d9b96adb +uses: snyk/actions/[email protected] Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: Using a specific version tag improves readability and maintainability, making it easier to update the action in the future without relying on a commit hash.	8
Enhancement	Replace the placeholder Docker image name with the actual image name for the project Replace the placeholder 'your/image-to-test' with the actual name of the Docker image you want to test. .github/workflows/snyk-security.yml [70] -run: docker build -t your/image-to-test . +run: docker build -t my-project/app-image:latest . Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: Replacing the placeholder with the actual Docker image name is necessary for the workflow to function correctly and ensures that the correct image is built and tested.	7

---

Previous suggestions

Suggestions up to commit ef52eef

Category	Suggestion	Score
Security	Enable the Snyk Code test step to perform SAST analysis Consider uncommenting the Snyk Code test step to ensure that SAST analysis is performed and potential security issues are identified. .github/workflows/snyk-security.yml [57] -run: snyk code test --sarif > snyk-code.sarif # || true +run: snyk code test --sarif > snyk-code.sarif || true Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 Why: Enabling the Snyk Code test step ensures that SAST analysis is performed, which is crucial for identifying potential security issues.	9
	Enable the Snyk IaC test step to perform Infrastructure as Code analysis Consider uncommenting the Snyk IaC test step to ensure that Infrastructure as Code analysis is performed and potential security issues are identified. .github/workflows/snyk-security.yml [66] -run: snyk iac test --report # || true +run: snyk iac test --report || true Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 Why: Enabling the Snyk IaC test step ensures that Infrastructure as Code analysis is performed, which is important for identifying potential security issues.	9
Best practice	Use a specific version tag for the Snyk setup action instead of a commit hash Consider using a specific version for the Snyk setup action instead of a commit hash. This improves readability and makes it easier to track and update the action version. .github/workflows/snyk-security.yml [42] -uses: snyk/actions/setup@806182742461562b67788a64410098c9d9b96adb +uses: snyk/actions/[email protected] Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: Using a specific version tag instead of a commit hash improves readability and maintainability, making it easier to track and update the action version.	8
Enhancement	Use the actual Docker image name instead of a placeholder in the build command Replace the placeholder 'your/image-to-test' with the actual name of the Docker image you want to test. This ensures that the correct image is being analyzed by Snyk Container. .github/workflows/snyk-security.yml [70] -run: docker build -t your/image-to-test . +run: docker build -t my-project/app-image:latest . Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: Replacing the placeholder with the actual Docker image name ensures that the correct image is being analyzed, improving the accuracy of the Snyk Container analysis.	7

[codiumai-pr-agent-pro]

PR-Agent was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your git user with your CodiumAI identity here.

CI Failure Feedback 🧐

Action: comment

Failed stage: Label Commenter [❌]

Failure summary: The action failed because the configuration file .github/issue-auto-comments.yml was not found. This file is required for the action to execute properly.

Relevant error logs: 1: ##[group]Operating System 2: Ubuntu ... 204: ##[endgroup] 205: [INFO] Version 1.10.0 206: [INFO] Usage https://github.com/peaceiris/actions-label-commenter#readme 207: [INFO] event name: pull_request_target 208: [INFO] config file path: .github/issue-auto-comments.yml 209: [INFO] label name: Review effort [1-5]: 2 210: [INFO] label event: labeled 211: [INFO] issue number: 5 212: ##[error]Action failed with error "not found .github/issue-auto-comments.yml"

---

✨ CI feedback usage guide:

---

The CI feedback tool (/checks) automatically triggers when a PR has a failed check.
The tool analyzes the failed checks and provides several feedbacks:

• Failed stage
• Failed test name
• Failure summary
• Relevant error logs

In addition to being automatically triggered, the tool can also be invoked manually by commenting on a PR:

/checks "https://github.com/{repo_name}/actions/runs/{run_number}/job/{job_number}"

where {repo_name} is the name of the repository, {run_number} is the run number of the failed check, and {job_number} is the job number of the failed check.

Configuration options

• enable_auto_checks_feedback - if set to true, the tool will automatically provide feedback when a check is failed. Default is true.
• excluded_checks_list - a list of checks to exclude from the feedback, for example: ["check1", "check2"]. Default is an empty list.
• enable_help_text - if set to true, the tool will provide a help message with the feedback. Default is true.
• persistent_comment - if set to true, the tool will overwrite a previous checks comment with the new feedback. Default is true.
• final_update_message - if persistent_comment is true and updating a previous checks message, the tool will also create a new message: "Persistent checks updated to latest commit". Default is true.

See more information about the checks tool in the docs.