-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 227
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Kubeflow 1.10] Distributions and Kubeflow #765
Comments
Are you planning on having your distro ready in sync with the KF 1.10 release? |
Hi @rimolive, Answers to the distribution participation questions:
|
As the current distribution owner for Red Hat OpenShift AI, I will add the answer to the questions:
|
|
Regarding the Charmed Kubeflow distribution:
Also, if its possible, keep only myself and not @DnPlas as a point of contact, since I communicate everything with the team :) |
/assign @rimolive |
from Ricardo from Release meeting progressing |
No updates so far from @rimolive |
@rimolive any news on this? |
Calling all Distribution owners! We are planning to release rc.2 next Monday March 3rd, and we'll officially begin the distribution testing. One concern raised is that our schedule to release GA is March 31st, and the deadline for distribution testing is very tight. We'd like to gather more feedback about this concern from the other distributions so we can plan a new release date. I really appreciate any feedback so we can decide on keep the original schedule or delay the release date. |
You can test on the 1.10 branch and https://github.com/kubeflow/manifests/milestone/1 is the milestone with current issues. kubeflow/pipelines#11669 is also quite relevant. |
I'm ok with your timing. As long as we don't run into issues testing should be done within those timelines. |
Calling all Distribution owners. With rc.2 release last week, we are good to go with Distribution testing. We need your feedback if testing is running fine and we need this asap. For the Distribution owners who did not yet confirm participation in Distribution Testing, let me know if you can run the tests. cc @mvlassis @zijianjoy @chensun @yhwang @johnugeorge @saileshd1402 @nagar-ajay @julioo @thesuperzapper @liuqi @xujinheng @alexeadem |
https://github.com/kubeflow/manifests/tree/v1.10-branch is the branch to test, because it will always be ahead of the RCs. |
Hi @rimolive, thank you for reaching out and keeping us in the loop! On our side (Charmed Kubeflow distribution), because of the delays in the RC release for some of the components (e.g. Notebooks, Katib), we are still currently wrapping up the updates across all distribution artifacts to align them with the latest RC versions. We expect this to be done by the end of this week, such that we can start testing the full bundle on Monday, March 17th, across all our use cases and product integrations to investigate whether regressions are present. Currently, the plan is 1 week behind schedule, so delaying the release by an additional week would be beneficial and very much appreciated. This extra time would allow us to test the full deployment thoroughly and flag any issues to you, based on both integration testing and our Solution QA extensive testing. |
Providing an update for Charmed Kubeflow: The QA team tested the bundle and found with no issues. This means that we're going to release a beta version of the distribution later today. |
Hi, sorry for the delay. I've tested QBO with Kubeflow version v1.10.0-rc.2. Everything works as expected now, but I had to make a few changes:: DEX/JWTClearing site data or opening an incognito window was necessary to get past this error.
RBAC
and
were necessary to access the Kubeflow Web UI kustomizeThe options
After those changes, Kubeflow is working as expected with the NVIDIA GPU Operator and the following components:
|
This issue will be used to track the progress of and coordinate with distributions along the 1.10 release.
While we hope all distros will manage to be ready when the KF 1.10 release is out, this is sometimes difficult to achieve. In this issue, we want to both keep track of the progress of distributions towards the KF 1.10 release and also know which of the distros will be working on KF 1.10 (testing during the distribution testing cycle) even if they can't meet the KF 1.10 deadline.
Tagging distribution owners identified from previous releases (Any new or missed distro owners, please comment on this issue)
@chensun
@saileshd1402
@nagar-ajay
@xujinheng
Please let us know if you'll be participating in the 1.10 release by answering the following questions:
Please note the release timelines are being discussed in #761.
cc @tarilabs @juliusvonkohout @varodrig @diegolovison @tombuuz @dpoulopoulos @saileshd1402 @mvlassis @tarekabouzeid @hbelmiro @milosjava @jbottum
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: