-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 427
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update self-managed templates to use internal LB for node-to-node communication #5210
Update self-managed templates to use internal LB for node-to-node communication #5210
Conversation
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #5210 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 52.78% 52.78%
=======================================
Files 270 270
Lines 29060 29060
=======================================
Hits 15340 15340
Misses 12928 12928
Partials 792 792 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
c339bf3
to
8aaedd3
Compare
46477bf
to
0561647
Compare
Why don't we want the changes from #5209 for these templates? |
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
Do these templates produce nodes that can communicate with the control plane without the fix from #5209? |
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
I think that coupling with the default template is intended exactly for the kinds of changes we're making to look here. With the approach in this PR, we'll now need to copy-paste those same patches defined for the default template in #5209 to these four other templates, vs. defining them once in the default template and letting them propagate to these other templates automatically. |
A change like #5209 needs to be propagated across all templates and not just to these four flavors. |
0561647
to
75d754d
Compare
WIP, hold. |
75d754d
to
5640ff5
Compare
/cc @nojnhuh |
1e5f6b2
to
0e7399b
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
Thanks for your hard work on this @nawazkh! 🚀
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: c2a2db7f01260922d926b5c9f53efd10da7ca9a3
|
/retest |
- bastion, azure cni v1, ephemeral, edgezone are independent of default templates
987cb4f
to
d753715
Compare
/lgtm Good catch @mboersma! |
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 9c9ac0c622c85f65a06e57d56c55294a4bc1bd32
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: nawazkh The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/retest |
What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)
format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):Fixes: #5301
Special notes for your reviewer:
Next will update managed K8s templates.
cherry-pick candidate
TODOs:
Release note: