-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Unable to Add Additional Webhooks Without Forcing Re-scaffold #4146
Labels
help wanted
Denotes an issue that needs help from a contributor. Must meet "help wanted" guidelines.
kind/bug
Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug.
lifecycle/frozen
Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness.
Comments
camilamacedo86
added
kind/bug
Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug.
good first issue
Denotes an issue ready for a new contributor, according to the "help wanted" guidelines.
help wanted
Denotes an issue that needs help from a contributor. Must meet "help wanted" guidelines.
and removed
good first issue
Denotes an issue ready for a new contributor, according to the "help wanted" guidelines.
labels
Sep 9, 2024
/assign |
camilamacedo86
added
the
lifecycle/frozen
Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness.
label
Oct 30, 2024
camilamacedo86
added a commit
to camilamacedo86/kubebuilder
that referenced
this issue
Nov 9, 2024
We are reverting the changes done in the PR kubernetes-sigs#4286. We are just keeping the e2e tests improvements. We will not able to solve the issue kubernetes-sigs#4146 without add new markers. We cannot skip the action to write an webhook since it will result in incomplete inplementation in the <kind>_webhook.go as in the <kind>_webhook_test.go
We cannot skip. |
vtrenton
pushed a commit
to vtrenton/kubebuilder
that referenced
this issue
Nov 20, 2024
We are reverting the changes done in the PR kubernetes-sigs#4286. We are just keeping the e2e tests improvements. We will not able to solve the issue kubernetes-sigs#4146 without add new markers. We cannot skip the action to write an webhook since it will result in incomplete inplementation in the <kind>_webhook.go as in the <kind>_webhook_test.go
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
help wanted
Denotes an issue that needs help from a contributor. Must meet "help wanted" guidelines.
kind/bug
Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug.
lifecycle/frozen
Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness.
What broke? What's expected?
When trying to add an additional webhook (e.g., conversion webhook) to an API where other webhooks (like defaulting or validation) are already scaffolded, Kubebuilder throws an error stating that the webhook files already exist. Currently, the only workaround is to use the --force option, which leads to the entire webhook being re-scaffolded, overwriting any custom implementation added by the user. This behavior results in lost code and makes it difficult to incrementally add webhooks.
Kubebuilder should allow adding additional webhooks without forcing the user to use --force and without overwriting existing implementation. It should:
Such as we do in the main.go and for the test-e2e as well. See the WebhookTestUpdater for test-e2e. We need ensure that webhooks follow the same: https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kubebuilder/blob/master/pkg/plugins/golang/v4/scaffolds/internal/templates/test/e2e/test.go#L58-L103
Reproducing this issue
Expected Behavior/Request Kubebuilder should scaffold only the specific webhook (e.g., conversion) requested without overwriting the existing webhook code. It should intelligently detect existing webhooks and add the necessary logic for the new type while keeping the current implementation intact.
KubeBuilder (CLI) Version
4.2.0
PROJECT version
No response
Plugin versions
No response
Other versions
No response
Extra Labels
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: