You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
An observer pointed out that the baselevel/"uplift" term in the hillslope evolution exercise may be confusing to non-geomorphologists. In fact, it isn't necessary to the purpose of that particular lesson, and could be removed from the derivation. For the steady analytical solution, one could instead set the left-hand side (dz/dt) to a constant erosion rate -E, and the solution is identical. Then, for the numerical solution, one could lower the elevation of the two boundary nodes instead of raising the interior nodes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
An observer pointed out that the baselevel/"uplift" term in the hillslope evolution exercise may be confusing to non-geomorphologists. In fact, it isn't necessary to the purpose of that particular lesson, and could be removed from the derivation. For the steady analytical solution, one could instead set the left-hand side (dz/dt) to a constant erosion rate -E, and the solution is identical. Then, for the numerical solution, one could lower the elevation of the two boundary nodes instead of raising the interior nodes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: