Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

differentiate unlocked theorems from axioms in theorem list #70

Open
mcol opened this issue Jul 1, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

differentiate unlocked theorems from axioms in theorem list #70

mcol opened this issue Jul 1, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested

Comments

@mcol
Copy link
Contributor

mcol commented Jul 1, 2024

For example, pow_zero shows this text: "pow_zero a : a ^ 0 = 1 is one of the two axioms defining exponentiation in this game." If pow_zero is indeed an axiom, perhaps it should have a different colour or icon, to differentiate it from the unlocked theorems.

@joneugster
Copy link
Collaborator

This is an interesting point. I guess for game play it doesn't really matter what are axioms and what are theorems.

Making them colourful might draw too much attention on them when the attention should rather go to the newly introduced theorems (which are colourful in the next update)

@joneugster joneugster added enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested labels Aug 28, 2024
@mcol
Copy link
Contributor Author

mcol commented Aug 29, 2024

I agree, colour would not work well. Perhaps as a tooltip? But feel free to close if this suggestion goes beyond or against the objectives of the game.

@joneugster
Copy link
Collaborator

That's a good idea. At the place in lean4game where the signature is autogenerated, one could also check whether the statement is an axiom.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants