Licenz and refund

[nialma-dev]

I purchased Laragon 7 about an hour ago and I am very disappointed. There are no changes compared to the free version 6. I would like to return my license and get a refund.

[alxndr-w]

Hi @nialma-dev. @leokhoa will take care of this.

But I'd like to point to

• Why I'm introducing a paid licensing model #960 "Why I'm introducing a paid licensing model" and
• Laragon 7.0.0 #931 Laragon 7.0.0

as well as a this tiny road map:

• https://github.com/leokhoa/laragon/milestone/2 Laragon 7.1 and
• https://github.com/leokhoa/laragon/milestone/3 Laragon 7.2

There are no changes compared to the free version 6

This is not true. You'll find proof here

• https://github.com/leokhoa/laragon/issues?q=label%3Afixed-7.0.0+is%3Aclosed
• https://github.com/leokhoa/laragon/issues?q=label%3Afixed-7.0.1+is%3Aclosed
• https://github.com/leokhoa/laragon/issues?q=label%3Afixed-7.0.2+is%3Aclosed
• https://github.com/leokhoa/laragon/issues?q=label%3Afixed-7.0.3+is%3Aclosed
• https://github.com/leokhoa/laragon/issues?q=label%3Afixed-7.0.4+is%3Aclosed
• https://github.com/leokhoa/laragon/issues?q=label%3Afixed-7.0.5+is%3Aclosed

Of course, it's your decision.

But keep in mind that Laragon was right before being "abandoned" and discontinued. That's why this step was taken and Leo proofed that he continously delivers support, updates, bugfixes and also new features.

[leokhoa]

@nialma-dev : What is your email address?

The refund policy is described in the EULA: https://laragon.org/eula

I have no issue with you using the free Laragon v6 and don't want to support the development of Laragon. I'm happy to process a refund, but please refrain from posting misleading statement.

[nialma-dev]

The problem seems to be solved.

@leokhoa the oderer-id is Order #82179840 and I apologize for this post, but I couldn't find another way to communicate the issue. I no longer use Laragon 6 and the licenz of laragon 7 is deaktivated - I have customized my system accordingly - without Laragon, WAMP, etc.

@alxndr-w you are right when you refer to the changes, but significant changes like automatisms for path changes/ version changes were not.... this is important to me. But everyone has their own way and opinion.

[alxndr-w]

but significant changes like automatisms for path changes/ version changes were not.... this is important to me. But everyone has their own way and opinion.

Sure. Please still feel invited to suggest those features here, if they are missing.

[leokhoa]

@nialma-dev : This is because you didn't review the EULA before purchasing.

The auto-update feature is a simple addition, and I plan to include it in the next version of Laragon.
The reason I haven't implemented it yet is because of a significant downside: new version changes may introduce breaking changes that unexpectedly disrupt your workflow, leading to unwanted surprises and many hours debugging issues.
Just 1 click via "Tools > Quick add", you can have a specific version of the software you want to work with. This will ensure your work stable and predictable.

I will think a best way to balance both.

You can setup the environment yourself but it is just a day-0 of operations. Your time is precious. But it is your opinion.