Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Chess960 analysis starting position support #1662

Open
aurimus opened this issue Feb 29, 2016 · 6 comments · May be fixed by #16978
Open

Chess960 analysis starting position support #1662

aurimus opened this issue Feb 29, 2016 · 6 comments · May be fixed by #16978

Comments

@aurimus
Copy link

aurimus commented Feb 29, 2016

One should be able to choose the starting position (maybe simply in place of first move)

Currently it explores only one starting position - the standard.

@JoelMon
Copy link
Contributor

JoelMon commented Mar 1, 2016

I tought it can be done but when you go into the analysis board, going into the board editor then go back into the analysis board but that doesn't work. When you do that it sets the game back to standard and when you try to select Chess950 it resets everything back to standard positions.

Maybe when a person selects Chess950 in the analysis board it should go straight into the board editor to allow the person to set the board how they want.

All this said and done, isn't the purpose of Chess960 to have random starting positions, making an opening explore of it sort of a moot point?

@Unihedro
Copy link
Contributor

Unihedro commented Mar 1, 2016

image

@Unihedro
Copy link
Contributor

Unihedro commented Mar 1, 2016

to set a custom starting position in chess960: paste FEN

ideally a UI shortcut should be implemented to take a start position ID

@Unihedro Unihedro changed the title Chess960 opening explorer Chess960 analysis starting position support Mar 1, 2016
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Dec 14, 2019

There has been no activity on this issue for 2 years. It will be automatically closed in 2 weeks.
If the issue is still relevant, please briefly explain (or remove the label). Feel free to reopen at any time.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Dec 14, 2019
@niklasf niklasf removed the stale label Dec 14, 2019
@SergioGlorias SergioGlorias marked this as a duplicate of #11857 Feb 13, 2025
@SergioGlorias SergioGlorias marked this as a duplicate of #16940 Feb 13, 2025
@SergioGlorias
Copy link
Member

It is an old question that remains pending

@AdityaK1729
Copy link

Oh this existed already i should have checked :/

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

7 participants