Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request] mutually funded channels implementation #3673

Closed
brain-zhang opened this issue Nov 4, 2019 · 5 comments
Closed

[Feature Request] mutually funded channels implementation #3673

brain-zhang opened this issue Nov 4, 2019 · 5 comments

Comments

@brain-zhang
Copy link

brain-zhang commented Nov 4, 2019

Background

It seems now the Lightning implementations do not allow for mutually funded channels; its not bidirectional by default.

I created a channel and i don't have any inbound capacity on that very channel. Then I send some bitcoin to the other side, Can i receive the money back by the same channel without gererating an invoice?

After reading through this whole issues management, but i found nothing about this thread; Of sure, I'll check the docs too; If I missed something, thanks for pointing me that.

@brain-zhang brain-zhang changed the title [Feature Request] [Feature Request] mutually funded channels implementation Nov 4, 2019
@molxyz
Copy link

molxyz commented Nov 4, 2019

@brain-zhang

I created a channel and i don't have any inbound capacity on that very channel. Then I send some bitcoin to the other side, Can i receive the money back by the same channel without gererating an invoice?

No. There's WIP for key send txs, look at PR #2455 but this is not in the current implementation.

@carlaKC
Copy link
Collaborator

carlaKC commented Nov 4, 2019

The title and body on this feature request seem unrealated to me? There are two issues here:

  1. Title - Mutually funded channels: assuming this means the ability for both parties to contribute funds to a channel on creation. This is generally referred to as dual funded channels, and there is a PR open to the BOLTS here.
  2. Body - invoiceless sends: The ability to send to a node without an invoice, which currently has a WIP PR out as @molxyz points out

Which one of these are you after?

@brain-zhang
Copy link
Author

brain-zhang commented Nov 4, 2019

Dear @molxyz and @carlaKC , Thank you for your guidance; I think WIP is the extremeccly feature what i want;

Sorry for I'd never noticed it before; and then i'll identified as Duplicate of #2455

@brain-zhang
Copy link
Author

brain-zhang commented Nov 4, 2019

Duplicate of #2455

@Roasbeef
Copy link
Member

Roasbeef commented Nov 6, 2019

I created a channel and i don't have any inbound capacity on that very channel.

@brain-zhang, you can use Loop to resolve this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants